|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The True Savior By: Bijla Singh Keeping slaves and their sexual exploitation were common practices during Mohammad’s time. It is absolutely shocking that Mohammad not only advocated but engaged himself in such practices. Muhammad had many male and female slaves. He used to buy and sell them, but he purchased (more slaves) than he sold, especially after God empowered him by His message, as well as after his immigration from Mecca. (Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, Zad al-Ma'ad, Part I, p. 160) It is astonishing that Mohammad himself took part in slave trade after he was “declared” the prophet. One then wonders whether he truly was a prophet who had come to save humanity, preach equality and show one true path to humans or further solidify the practice of slavery and rape in the name of religion by claiming it to be the “law of Allah”. How could such person be a role model let alone a prophet? Therefore, he was not a prophet for everyone but only for savage individuals who wanted to keep female slaves for sex exploitation. He encouraged the rape of captured women in front of their husbands. Muslims need to explain why sex with slaves, as clearly mentioned in the following passage, is anything less than savage: “Abu Sa'id al-Khudri said: The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, send down the Qur'anic verse: "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand possess." [Surah 4:24] ...Sunan Abu Dawud, Book V, Chapter 711, Number 2150” You can have sexual intercourse with two slave girls at a time without ghusl (bath) but can’t do like this with free women. (Malik’s Muwatta 2.23.90) These poor women who had been taken prisoner were authorized to be raped by Mohammad in FRONT of their still living HUSBANDS! How is this just? How is this even human? The example of Saffiyah is also shocking. This Jewish woman whose father had just been killed by the Muslims and husband had just been TORTURED to death was taken by Mohammad as his wife. Would she have happily married him? Could this have been a marriage free from fear and compulsion? What kind of woman could see her husband tortured to death and then happily marry the torturer? Enslaving the captives of war was further practiced by the followers of Islam. Many Caliphs kept sex slaves and Muslim invaders like Ahmad Shah Abdali, Babar, Nadir Shah and Tamur Shah invaded India, killed innocent people and enslaved thousands of women and children who were later either sold in the flesh market or kept as slaves and maids. Such practice is acknowledged by Muslim scholars. "Islam does not prohibit slavery but retains it for two reasons. The first reason is war (whether it is a civil war or a foreign war in which the captive is either killed or enslaved) provided that the war is not between Muslims against each other - it is not acceptable to enslave the violators, or the offenders, if they are Muslims. Only non-Muslim captives may be enslaved or killed. The second reason is the sexual propagation of slaves which would generate more slaves for their owner." (You Ask and Islam Answers, Dr. 'Abdul-Latif Mushtahari, pp. 51-52). "The root of the beginning of slavery is prisoners of war; the bounties have become lawful to the nation of Muhammad." (Ibn Timiyya, Vol. 32, p. 89). If Mohammad was “true messenger” and slavery is clearly wrong, he would have forbidden it outright. There were many things prevalent in the world but the job and duty of a messenger of God is to reveal the truth. Slavery is wrong and must be stopped. But Mohammad allowed it which gives Masters permission to have sexual relations with them (which implies raping them. If something is wrong, it is wrong. Neither did Mohammad abolish slavery nor did he oppose rape of slave women by their masters. It is clear that Mohammad made no attempt to free the slaves, uplift womanhood and provide them the freedom to live an independent life and achieve salvation. They always remained subordinate and subservient to free men. Pride in social status is empty; pride in personal glory is useless. The One Lord gives shade to all beings. (Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Ang 83) Recognize the Lord's Light within all, and do not consider social class or status; there are no classes or castes in the world hereafter. ||1|| (Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Ang 349) Modesty and righteousness both have vanished and falsehood moves about as the leader, O Lalo. The function of the Qazis and the Brahmins is over and the Satan now reads the marriage rites (rape). The Muslim women read the Quran and in suffering call upon God, O Lalo. The Hindu women of high caste and others of low caste, may also be put in the same account, O Lalo. (Ang 722) |
|